Tom Atlee: DemocracyOS and Public Wisdom

Tom Atlee

Tom Atlee

Dear Ana Lis,

It was great to meet you, to talk for hours with enthusiasm and humor, and to establish a connection with Argentina’s DemocracyOS movement.  (For the info of those on the To and Cc list above who are not familiar with DemocracyOS  it is a grassroots open source system in Argentina for online proposals, discussion, and voting on legislation.  It is connected to a separate political party – the Net Party  – which runs candidates committed to voting on legislation according to what citizens decide on DemocracyOS.  Both DemocracyOS and the Net Party have some parallels elsewhere in the world and are themselves spreading their memes to other places.)

Read the rest of this entry »

Comments Off
Mar 2

Michel Bauwens: Professor Christian Iaione on the City as Commons

Michel Bauwens

Michel Bauwens

Interviewed: Professor Christian Iaione on the City as Commons

A commons-based economy cannot thrive without appropriate institutions, especially those that represent a “partner state” approach. Professor Christian Iaione of LUISS University in Rome is a pioneer of such institutional innovation in Italian cities. I believe his work with the city of Bologna on Bologna’s Regulation for the Care and Regeneration of Urban Commons is a breakthrough. This regulation allows citizen coalitions to propose improvements to their neighborhoods, and the city to contract with citizens for key assistance. In other words, the municipality functions as an enabler giving citizens individual and collective autonomy. More than 30 projects have already been approved in this context and dozens of Italian cities are adopting this regulation. Read more.

Comments Off
Feb 21

Reference: Spanda Journal on Collective Intelligence

Spanda CI–EditorialSpanda CI Cover Vol 2 2014

Spanda CI Abstracts

Full Issue Online (184 Pages)

All Articles Individually Below the Line

Read the rest of this entry »

Comments Off
Jan 22

Jim Rough: To Facilitate a National Conversation

Jim Rough

Jim Rough

Since 1993 we’ve been experimenting with a strategy for convening this kind of large-­‐system conversation and we are excited at how well our approach is working, and the prospect for how it can work at the national and global levels. Our approach is different than the one described in the Project paper, however. And it’s different from “Deliberative Democracy” approaches in general because it aims for a creative conversation, rather than one that is deliberative. This requires a different set of facilitation skills and understandings about group process.

PDF (7 Pages): To Facilitate a National Conversation

Comments Off
Jan 16