Amazon is STUPID — Seek Help from Strangers

Categories: Commerce,Ineptitude
Amazon Page

Amazon Page

Folks,

Amazon is stupid. Several people who know me and bought the book have loaded reviews and had them rejected, evidently because their name comes up in association with mine in some stupid web search algorithm that Amazon uses to identify friends and family. It has not occurred to them that over 7,500 attended my conference until it was stolen from me, over 2,000 people are linked directly with me at LinkedIn, and so on. I have told Amazon that I don’t “have” friends and family that read my books, but their stupid algorithm evidently knows better.

Here is the specific review posted by a business associate who is also an occasional contributing editor here at Phi Beta Iota. It was posted cleanly the first time it was submitted, it was “cleansed” when I changed the cover and corrected some typos in the description — another stupid Amazon policy, they treat such changes as a “new” book and wipe out all reviews — and then refused when the author tried to repost it.

Review (Guest): OPEN POWER – Electoral Reform Act of 2015 – Open Source Activist Tool Kit

So here is the deal: I am seeking help from strangers — unless Amazon has an alliance with Google and NSA they have no idea you are one of the 14,000+ subscribers to Phi Beta Iota or one of the 2000+ constantly changing daily visitors to Phi Beta Iota. I am asking you to spend $2.99 to buy the book (this makes it a verified purchase when you load your review), and review it. The ideas in the ugly little booklet for the good of us all are in your hands.

Just for information, Amazon is rigging the system to flush all the original reviewers out of the system to make way for new reviewers. I started with them on 4 April 2000, 14 years ago, and as a result of my 2,000 plus reviews, am the #1 Amazon reviewer for non-fiction, reading in 98 categories.  I was #25 over-all (including all the folks that review toys, movies, software, and ficiton) until they started rigging the system. Among the “tricks” they use now is to declare anyone that votes for more than one of someone’s reviews to be a “fan” whose voters are no longer counted — I am honored to have over 670 “fans” disenfranchised by Amazon; to count negative reviews, the kiss of death for a serious non-fiction reviewer; and their latest trick, to not carry over reviews from one edition of the book to the next, thus destroying years of really deep contributions from tens of thousands of mature Amazon reviewers. This is not personal to me, they are screwing all the older reviewers who have given so much over the past fourteen years.

They have no stinkin’ integrity. Act as you see fit, and thank you.

Robert Steele

Comments Off
Mar 2

Worth a Look: Project Veritas

Categories: Civil Society,Ethics
Home Page

Home Page

Founded by James O’Keefe, the mission of Project Veritas is:

Investigate and expose corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud, and other misconduct in both public and private institutions in order to achieve a more ethical and transparent society.

Project Veritas is the most effective non-profit on the national scene, period.

Comments Off
Mar 2

Michael Kearns: Google in Charge of Truth?

Michael S. Kearns

Michael S. Kearns

In charge of truth? Google considers ranking sites on facts, not popularity

Google is considering putting itself in charge of online truth, in order to assist users in an age of information overload. The web giant would rank search results based on each site’s ‘truth score’ instead of its popularity level. Read more.

Comments Off
Mar 2

Anthony Judge: Eliciting massive social consensus

Anthony Judge

Anthony Judge

Enabling Fruitful Multiplication of Global Population

Eliciting massive social consensus by unconstrained reframing of strategic priorities

Read the rest of this entry »

Comments Off
Mar 2